An International Registry Study of Early-Stage NSCLC treatment variations (LUCAEUROPE) in Europe and the USA highlighting variations

Philip Baum, Rafael Cardoso, Jacopo Lenzi, Ronald A.M. Damhuis, Ad F.T.M. Verhagen, Cindy De Gendt, Hanna Peacock, Paul De Leyn, Niels L. Christensen, Kaire Innos, Kersti Oselin, Vesna Zadnik, Tina Zagarv, Hermann Brenner, Hauke Winter
Publicatiedatum
Naam tijdschrift
European Journal of Cancer

Objective: Harmonized European NSCLC incidence, treatment approach, and survival based on national tumor registries are unclear.

Summary background data: Surgery has the potential to cure NSCLC and significantly prolong survival. This large-scale international study aimed to investigate treatment variations in Europe and the USA, as well as the determinants for its utilization. 

Methods: The retrospective cohort study analyzed data from six European national population-based cancer registries (Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, the Netherlands, and Slovenia) and the US SEER database from 2010–2015. 

Results: The study computed cancer incidence, survival, and age-standardized proportions of the use of various therapies. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between resection and demographic and clinical parameters. A total of 428,107 records were analyzed. Among all countries, Estonia had the highest surgical resection rate (79.3 %) and the lowest radiation rate (7.3 %) for stage I patients. The Netherlands had the highest rate of radiotherapy across all years of investigation and the lowest surgery rate between 2012 and 2015. The primary treatment for early-stage NSCLC showed significant international variation, with the USA having a decrease in surgical rates from 67.6 % to 59.5 %. Resection was less frequently performed as tumor stage increased, patients aged, other lung cancer besides adenocarcinoma was present, and when the tumor site overlapped multiple lobes. 

Conclusions: Resection rates have declined in some studied European countries and the USA and resection rates vary substantially among countries. Interpretation of current scientific lung cancer evidence and international guidelines results in wide variations in patient treatment.